Oettinger And Hartmann

Welcome to the Mercedes 190 forum

Welcome to the Mercedes 190 owners forum, the place to be for all owners and lovers of the Mercedes 190E, 190 and 190D cars. Including Cosworth (2.3 16v and 2.5 16v), EVO 1 and EVO 2 models. Modified and concourse, track cars and daily drivers, all are welcome.

This free UK based forum was started back in November 2005 to serve the w201 community and now has over 4000 members from all around the world and 340,000 + posts.

The members welcome you and encourage you to stay a while and have a look around. We offer you friendly chat and access to some very useful information as well as tutorials with photos and videos for many common repair and maintenance jobs. Whatever your needs there is a good chance you will be able to find what your looking for. Such as our Mercedes 190 buyers guide

Sign up to gain access to all areas including for sale / classified areas and country wide meetings and events. Many forum features and sections are only available once you sign up.

Join our us at mercedes-190.co.uk!

If you're already a member please log in to your account:

Oettinger And Hartmann; all things for both
Topic Started: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:35 am (1,330 Views)
cra_arc	Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:35 am Post #1
Member Posts: 6,233 Group: Members Member #4 Joined: November 2, 2005	a thread for the tuning companies Oettinger and hartmann who did a few conversins for the 190 in their day info in here as in the amg brabus threads



weneakhborz	Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:13 pm Post #2
Waynakh Borz Posts: 2,884 Group: Members Member #240 Joined: April 8, 2006	never heared of those.



Lewis 190E 2.5 16	Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:09 pm Post #3
Mercedes Techy Posts: 6,618 Group: Members Member #918 Joined: February 7, 2007	weneakhborz Jan 14 2008, 03:13 PM never heared of those. Oettinger produced the 190E 2.6-16 Hatmann made bodykits and replica wheels and still do But finding pictures of these are another story...



charl44	Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:13 pm Post #4
Member Posts: 1,960 Group: Members Member #243 Joined: April 10, 2006	Here`s A bit of tech info: http://www.baureihe201.de/W201/tuning.htm Ian



mazza	Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:37 pm Post #5
Member Posts: 701 Group: Members Member #151 Joined: January 24, 2006	cra_arc Jan 14 2008, 12:35 PM a thread for the tuning companies Oettinger and hartmann who did a few conversins for the 190 in their day info in here as in the amg brabus threads Hey!!! hope everyone is ok!! Thanks mate! Guys! I have sent a few emails to all 190e tuners requesting info for the 190e projects... I have now received some info a a pic from Oettinger, its in German but it gives us an idea of power figures etc....they are going to post some copies of brochures etc , so!!! plenty of scanning etc.... I am still waiting for replys from other tuners but with a bit of luck we shall have a nice pinned section for tuners.... Cheers mazza



mazza	Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:49 pm Post #6
Member Posts: 701 Group: Members Member #151 Joined: January 24, 2006	hey!! here's a pic Ok guys! not the best pic...needs to be larger...who's a keen photoshop user??? he he!! open to offers here!!! he he!!! cheers mazza



mazza	Mon Jan 14, 2008 4:00 pm Post #7
Member Posts: 701 Group: Members Member #151 Joined: January 24, 2006	hey guys!! i have some info for the 190 Oettinger but its in adobe pdf format....whos techie enough to change this from pdf to whatever so we can post it....? email me and i will forward the articles... not at my usual laptop... cheers mazza



RM Merc 190	Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:10 pm Post #8
Member Posts: 3,401 Group: Members Member #1,114 Joined: March 29, 2007	Courtesy of Mazza:



RM Merc 190	Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:11 pm Post #9
Member Posts: 3,401 Group: Members Member #1,114 Joined: March 29, 2007



RM Merc 190	Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:12 pm Post #10
Member Posts: 3,401 Group: Members Member #1,114 Joined: March 29, 2007



RM Merc 190	Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:12 pm Post #11
Member Posts: 3,401 Group: Members Member #1,114 Joined: March 29, 2007	Not that I can read german! But the figures look interesting!



Marv	Mon Jan 14, 2008 7:29 pm Post #12
Evo II Wheel Posts: 2,758 Group: Members Member #642 Joined: November 3, 2006	2.8-16 Lump:



weneakhborz	Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:39 pm Post #13
Waynakh Borz Posts: 2,884 Group: Members Member #240 Joined: April 8, 2006	whos is the 2.8-17 thing?any more info.?



kova	Tue Jan 15, 2008 6:57 am Post #14
Member Posts: 123 Group: Members Member #565 Joined: October 3, 2006	2.8-16.... http://mb190.tripod.com/readers/Bernard.html



NEIL	Tue Jan 15, 2008 7:24 am Post #15
Hello Posts: 17,250 Group: Members Member #63 Joined: November 18, 2005 Colour / Year / Engine Signal Red 1993 1.8 Auto	0-60mph in 5.5 seconds?



kova	Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:28 am Post #16
Member Posts: 123 Group: Members Member #565 Joined: October 3, 2006	NEIL Jan 15 2008, 08:24 AM 0-60mph in 5.5 seconds? yep mate...serious oops....



mazza	Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:47 am Post #17
Member Posts: 701 Group: Members Member #151 Joined: January 24, 2006	Hey!!! Hope everyone is ok!!! just a quick msg to say thanks to RM MERC 190, Cheers for that mate!!, nice job!! Also want to thank Philip Dorian Blau from Oettinger public relations and motorsport for the data. (gonna try and ask for data for the 2.8-16) Cheers mazza



papa	Tue Jan 15, 2008 9:59 am Post #18
Lap Dancer Posts: 431 Group: Members Member #3 Joined: November 2, 2005	NEIL Jan 15 2008, 08:24 AM 0-60mph in 5.5 seconds? I'm sorry, that's km/h 0 to 62.1 mph in 7.1 seconds



NEIL	Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:21 am Post #19
Hello Posts: 17,250 Group: Members Member #63 Joined: November 18, 2005 Colour / Year / Engine Signal Red 1993 1.8 Auto	It's quoted as: I suppose everyone�s wondering what that 2.8 can do. Well, Bernard took the liberty in providing some performance numbers. Max speed clocked in at 266 Km/h (165 MPh)( measured), acceleration (0-62 mph)~ 5.5 sec (measured). Max torque 320Nm (232 Ib.Ft.), 214 kw for 1200kg , displacement is 2789ccm or 2.8 rounded up. though tbh Papa's figure seems more realistic.



papa	Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:45 am Post #20
Lap Dancer Posts: 431 Group: Members Member #3 Joined: November 2, 2005	NEIL Jan 15 2008, 11:21 AM though tbh Papa's figure seems more realistic. About time. Been arround the club since November 04 and this is the first time someone actualy sais that I'm right.



weneakhborz	Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:10 pm Post #21
Waynakh Borz Posts: 2,884 Group: Members Member #240 Joined: April 8, 2006	the oettinger 2.6's Injection system looks diffrent isnt it?



CrysAk	Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:34 pm Post #22
Moar Bass! Posts: 5,324 Group: Members Member #456 Joined: August 14, 2006	NEIL Jan 15 2008, 11:21 AM It's quoted as: I suppose everyone�s wondering what that 2.8 can do. Well, Bernard took the liberty in providing some performance numbers. Max speed clocked in at 266 Km/h (165 MPh)( measured), acceleration (0-62 mph)~ 5.5 sec (measured). Max torque 320Nm (232 Ib.Ft.), 214 kw for 1200kg , displacement is 2789ccm or 2.8 rounded up. though tbh Papa's figure seems more realistic. so how does one make the 2.3 a 2.8



weneakhborz	Tue Jan 15, 2008 4:59 pm Post #23
Waynakh Borz Posts: 2,884 Group: Members Member #240 Joined: April 8, 2006	trial and error. needs deeper pistons and bigger injectors and diffrent timing



cossie connoisseur	Tue Jan 15, 2008 5:40 pm Post #24
fat tits Posts: 9,761 Group: Members Member #110 Joined: December 18, 2005	urm if a standard 2.5 can do 0 to 62 in 7.3 surely the 2.8 beast would be quicker than .2 of a second not much of a gain is it?



zoomer46	Thu Jan 24, 2008 5:45 pm Post #25
Member Posts: 1,244 Group: Members Member #509 Joined: September 2, 2006	thats exactly what i was thinking !!! :unsure: and i bet the conv was the best part of at least 6 grand. would of been better off with the albert turbo



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:38 pm Post #26
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:40 pm Post #27
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:41 pm Post #28
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008	. Edited by Bart707, Sat Dec 6, 2008 10:35 pm.



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:42 pm Post #29
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008	. Edited by Bart707, Sat Dec 6, 2008 10:35 pm.



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:43 pm Post #30
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008	. Edited by Bart707, Sat Dec 6, 2008 10:36 pm.



Bart707	Wed May 28, 2008 4:43 pm Post #31
Member Posts: 4,432 Group: Members Member #2,244 Joined: February 7, 2008	. Edited by Bart707, Sat Dec 6, 2008 10:36 pm.



weneakhborz	Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:01 pm Post #32
Waynakh Borz Posts: 2,884 Group: Members Member #240 Joined: April 8, 2006	mazza Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:49 pm needs to be larger... needs to be larger... needs to be larger... here you go mate.



Earl Grey	Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:03 am Post #33
Newbie Posts: 30 Group: Members Member #4,486 Joined: August 3, 2009	they'd never do a 0-60 km/h test, the international standard is 0-100 km/h which converts to 0-62 mp/h. so, 5.5 seconds is the mp/h time i reckon, which is outstanding. i imagine they'd have to change quite a lot more to achieve this though, weight loss etc?



1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)


« Previous Topic · 190 Media · Next Topic »