| Welcome to Mercedes-190.co.uk We are the Mercedes 190 owners forum, the place to be for all owners and fans of the Mercedes 190E, 190 and 190D cars. Including Cosworth (2.3 16v and 2.5 16v), EVO 1 and EVO 2 models. Modified and concourse, track cars and daily drivers, all are welcome. This free UK based forum was started back in November 2005 to serve the Mercedes 190 W201 community and now has over 9000 members from all around the world and 600,000 + posts. The members welcome you and encourage you to stay a while and have a look around. We offer you friendly chat and access to some very useful information as well as tutorials with photos and videos for many common repair and maintenance jobs. Whatever your needs there is a good chance you will be able to find what your looking for. Such as our Mercedes 190 buyers guide Sign up to gain access to all areas including for sale / classified areas and country wide meetings and events. Many forum features and sections are only available once you sign up. Join our forum at mercedes-190.co.uk! If you're already a member please log in to your account: **New members signing up** please check your junk mail for the email authorization email otherwise we cannot verify your new account. I have noticed a lot of unauthorized accounts in the system. Regards Admin |
| Engine Upgrades...........; Just Wondering.....? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:36 am (2,018 Views) | |
| jeremy | Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:36 am Post #1 |
![]()
Too Far Gone To Help
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I know that when we want an upgrade in power , it's relatavely easy for us to find an engine from somewhere in the M-B range that will fit right into our cars , that keeps it M-B original...... But , I was reading a blog on Jack Griffith's site ( He of the TVR Griffith ) and I couldn't help wondering if the engine from the TVR Speed Six 3.6L might fit my 3.6 190 ? nice engine, looks fab ..360bhp . Hmmmm..? As its a TVR unit , it will be v compact ..sound great too . If you could put any 4 or 6 cylinder into your car , which has the similar cc's as your unit , but not from M-B , what would you choose ? Jeremy |
![]() |
|
| bri957 | Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:15 am Post #2 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
One of the LS* range of V8's. Cheapish in a crate and a vast array of tuning potential. Personally I would not fit a made of cheese TVR straight six in anything, and if I owned a TVR, a LS* V8 would be swapped in rapidly. |
![]() |
|
| RobertE | Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:08 am Post #3 |
|
Serial victim...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My photobucket is down at present, but the logical (if costly) alternative is a 1950's four banger 2.5 litre racing engine - Ferrari, BRM, Vanwall, Coventry Climax. For myself, a well-sorted Evo engine would be as quick as I'd like to go... |
![]() |
|
| Johnboy Mac | Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:02 pm Post #4 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I know the TVR early 6cyl gave problems so one would have to be careful, regardless I reckon all of them get the well used. Interesting idea. If I was planning a on fitting a modern six I'd short list the Merc 3.2/3.5 V6 (with after market EFI) if pratical. But an old M103/104 moved back a few inches might be far more practical at the end of the day. I suppose if I'd no hang up's about using non Merc engines, the Alfa V6 would seem like a nice option but just ain't right imo. |
![]() |
|
| mazza | Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:21 pm Post #5 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
hi nice looking engine but seems like a lot of hassle imo, the inlet and outlet manifolds are on the wrong side compared to the Mercedes units. There are other straight six alternatives that already have the manifolds in the right places and not much bigger in size. very tasty!! go on check out the figures..you know you want to ![]() Shot at 2009-07-23 mazza |
![]() |
|
| Richy190E | Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:31 pm Post #6 |
|
bubble bubble
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A nice wankel rotary would be my favourite, but I reckon you'd fit a supercharged VW VR6 in no problem. A boxer engine would lower the CofG but fitting would be tricky due to width. |
![]() |
|
| bolide | Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:51 am Post #7 |
|
Bolide
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I like inline sixes, so maybe a turbo Skyline engine? Easy parts availability. You could use the gearbox as well... Nick Froome |
![]() |
|
| stwat | Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:05 am Post #8 |
![]()
|
I certainly wouldn't go anywhere near the TVR speed six engine. A guy who travels to Le Mans with us has a tamora speed six with only around 16,000 miles on the clock. The last service cost him over £1400 because the timing chain had become stretched causing some damage, i cant remember exactly what but i think water pump and some other bits and bobs, not good. Its always in for things to be put right on the engine. Off topic but the build quality of the car is truly shocking The seats and dash look like they have been stitched by a four year old using wool instead of cotton thread. Bits keep falling off inside and the roof leaks like an old dilapidated church roof Crap cars. |
![]() |
|
| Richy190E | Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:29 am Post #9 |
|
bubble bubble
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Um...thats why a tvr is a true enthusiasts car
|
![]() |
|
| mazza | Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:46 am Post #10 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
morning all "crap cars" he he!! and there was me being all diplomatic with "nice looking engine but a lot of manifold hassle" lol mazza |
![]() |
|
| jeremy | Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:09 am Post #11 |
![]()
Too Far Gone To Help
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And now back to the thread .............. What engine would you use as a proper alternative ? The Jaguar suggestion was excellent . Jeremy |
![]() |
|
| RobertE | Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:21 am Post #12 |
|
Serial victim...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A very good engine, which is highly tuneable, is the 2.5 litre Daimler V8 designed by the great Edward Turner (Triumph motorcycles). It is compact, light, and can be induced to produce 250 bhp. Jaguar (madly) scrapped it when they took over the company. It was fitted to the badge-engineered Jaguar/Daimler Mark 2 as well as the SP250 (Dart). It is brilliant. I had a go in a really hot SP 250 a few years ago to which a mad bugger in Sussex had fitted mechanical fuel injection. Blimey. As it's a Daimler, it might be appropriate. Turner also designed a bigger (4.5 litre?) version which they stuck in their large saloon, the Majestic Major. Now that, gents, is a serious car...
Edited by RobertE, Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:22 am.
|
![]() |
|
| mazza | Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:42 am Post #13 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi these would be my alternative engines with correct manifolds position straight six would be the jag 4 pot vw/audi 1.8turbo and affordable 300bhp figures 1st choice would be this (not cheap but the rewards would be huge) ![]() Shot at 2009-07-24 mazza |
![]() |
|
| Johnboy Mac | Fri Jul 24, 2009 11:35 am Post #14 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mazza, I really like Honda engines (all of them) but the S2000 has 'only' got, is it 240bhp? Would the hassel be worth the extra performance and cost? |
![]() |
|
| mazza | Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:13 pm Post #15 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hi yep! thats what I thought too mate! till I was taken for a drive in one in Portugal, in terms of reving that honda engine is a master piece. We did a run at around 3am and from a stock engine the car hit 285kmh and didnt miss a beat, bloody impressive. The torque figures are not that impressive but the engine just goes and goes. this engine with forced induction is hitting 400bhp+ with very controlable torque figures. If I was creating a serious straightline cruiser I would go with a straight six..but for a track car weapon, then this would be my choice. mazza |
![]() |
|
| Johnboy Mac | Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:23 pm Post #16 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mazza, see where your coming from. |
![]() |
|
| cookwibble | Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:45 pm Post #17 |
|
Part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
if i ever went to the expense of a non mb swap it would have to be a 1jzgte. (toyota 2.5 twin turbo) amazing engine. my jzx90 mk II was as big and luxurious as an s class but quicker than an r32 gtr skyline and more responsive than my ae86! |
![]() |
|
| Johnboy Mac | Fri Jul 24, 2009 1:21 pm Post #18 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know that particular engine, no doubt it's a good one. I do know the 3.0ltr turbo version from the early 90's bar the odd head gasket blowing I reckon it was first class. |
![]() |
|
| cookwibble | Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:22 pm Post #19 |
|
Part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1jzgte is the 2.5 version of the mk4 supras 3ltr, i think the one you are on about is the 7mgte which has head problems. 1jzgte is metal headgasket and forged bottom end standard! |
![]() |
|
| RobertE | Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:43 pm Post #20 |
|
Serial victim...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
On the other hand, I think an Aston Martin V8 would go in. All alloy quad cam and very light. Hmmm... |
![]() |
|
| Richy190E | Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:13 pm Post #21 |
|
bubble bubble
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone for 1001bhp?
|
![]() |
|
| RobertE | Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:31 pm Post #22 |
|
Serial victim...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now that would be a tight fit, as the actresss said to the bishop... |
![]() |
|
| shariffe | Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:58 pm Post #23 |
|
Part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i know that a toyota supra engine and gearbox fits in easily into a w124, so i cant see why it should not go into w201. there is a video on youtube somewhere . |
![]() |
|
| big al merc | Sun Aug 2, 2009 12:36 pm Post #24 |
|
Highly Addicted
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
chevy 350 v8 for me as easily tuneable and cheap for parts i mean 8 pistons for less than £100 delivered!! and that's complete with rings etc!! |
![]() |
|
| iggy | Sun Aug 2, 2009 1:09 pm Post #25 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
range rover 4.6 litre all alloy v8 220 bhp standard very light weight easy for parts and tuning |
![]() |
|
| RobertE | Sun Aug 2, 2009 1:12 pm Post #26 |
|
Serial victim...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
But a decent valver engine puts out 200 bhp anyway. EFi! |
![]() |
|
| merc190uk | Sun Aug 2, 2009 1:14 pm Post #27 |
|
The Godfather
![]()
|
zetec
|
![]() |
|
| 190si29 | Sun Aug 2, 2009 1:29 pm Post #28 |
|
the duke
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A 55 amg engine with a kleeman stage 2 550bhp |
![]() |
|
| iggy | Sun Aug 2, 2009 1:43 pm Post #29 |
|
More than part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
id prefer a proper 3.2 amg engine in mine, over the 16v any day, not much chance though |
![]() |
|
| big al merc | Mon Aug 3, 2009 8:50 am Post #30 |
|
Highly Addicted
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Richy190E | Mon Aug 3, 2009 9:21 am Post #31 |
|
bubble bubble
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Dont laugh too much, a turbocharged blueprinted zetec lump would make around 400bhp |
![]() |
|
| jeremy | Mon Aug 3, 2009 9:58 am Post #32 |
![]()
Too Far Gone To Help
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sorry Big Al , has to be the same configuration . Jeremy
|
![]() |
|
| Martrider | Mon Aug 3, 2009 10:02 am Post #33 |
|
Longest build time in history?
|
A M102 2.3 8v engine from a low mileage W124 with Bike carbs. Bolt straight in (assuming you've a manual car? no point with an Auto!) Awesome torque, and a lot more revvy. Keep it simple. ![]() Edit; Sorry, just re-read the whole point of the tread. lol In that case, and i do not understand why nobody has done it yet....... Volvo high pressure turbo 2.5-20v 5 cyl. The 2.0ltr 20v in my Volvo is a stonking engine, turn it longitundinal, plenty of tuning mods available and relativly cheap parts. Modified turbos regularly make over 400hp. That would be my next swap if i didn'w want a 16v screamer so much.
Edited by Martrider, Mon Aug 3, 2009 10:05 am.
|
![]() |
|
| Big Ben | Mon Aug 3, 2009 11:44 am Post #34 |
|
Sneaky 2.5-16 Driver!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now I'll run and hide!!
|
![]() |
|
| Neil | Mon Aug 3, 2009 11:45 am Post #35 |
|
Newbie
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^Let me guess, straight swap for three mint S14s
|
![]() |
|
| dazzagtir | Mon Aug 3, 2009 5:50 pm Post #36 |
|
Part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
2jz supra engine would be fun. |
![]() |
|
| big al merc | Mon Aug 3, 2009 5:50 pm Post #37 |
|
Highly Addicted
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ok what about this 6 cylinder in line engine with 480 bhp 6 cylinder 13 litre Edited by big al merc, Mon Aug 3, 2009 7:44 pm.
|
![]() |
|
| feoffle | Tue Aug 4, 2009 9:18 am Post #38 |
|
Part of things
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
F20C in the S2000 has a forged bottom end as standard, turbo or supercharger kit on an untouched engine will see 400whp and 9,000rpm. But then if I was gonna do that, I'd just buy an S2000 anyway. Besides, you can't beat N/A throttle response and linear power. If money was no object and it had to be a longitudinal 4-cylinder, a fully built F22C would see 280bhp
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Engine · Next Topic » |








![]](http://z2.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





The seats and dash look like they have been stitched by a four year old using wool instead of cotton thread. Bits keep falling off inside and the roof leaks like an old dilapidated church roof



9:18 AM Jul 11